The Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act is a federal proposal designed to rein in the unchecked power of regulatory agencies. Introduced as a response to the growing influence of unelected bureaucrats in shaping public policy, the REINS Act requires that any major rule or regulation with an economic impact of $100 million or more must receive explicit approval from Congress before taking effect.
The purpose of the REINS Act is simple: to restore the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches and to ensure that elected officials—not government agencies—are accountable for significant regulatory decisions. By subjecting major regulations to congressional oversight, the REINS Act addresses a long-standing concern that bureaucratic agencies wield too much power in crafting rules that affect every aspect of American life, from the economy to public health.
Congresswoman Kat Cammack (R-FL-03) and Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) reintroduced an updated version of the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act in September.
The updated version of the REINS Act includes several significant provisions to strengthen individual protections and enhance accountability:
- Defenses for Individuals: People can now argue that they could not reasonably understand their actions were illegal if the statute itself was unclear.
- Right to Sue: Citizens can sue to block the enforcement of any rule that an agency implements without prior congressional approval.
- LIBERTY Act Provisions: Agency guidance with an economic impact of $100 million or more must now receive congressional approval, aligning with the process for major rules.
- Deregulatory Actions: Agencies are exempt from seeking approval when withdrawing costly or burdensome rules.
Supporters of the REINS Act argue that it will cut down on unnecessary regulations and reduce the bureaucracy that often stifles innovation and economic growth. The Act represents a major step toward increasing transparency and giving citizens a direct say in the laws that govern them through their elected representatives. Critics of the current system point out that regulatory overreach not only burdens businesses and individuals but also undermines democratic principles by allowing unelected officials to make sweeping policy decisions.
Wisconsin provides a prime example of the REINS Act in action. During Governor Scott Walker’s administration, Wisconsin became the first state to implement a state-level REINS Act. This legislation proved effective in limiting the growth of state regulations, ensuring that rules with significant economic impact underwent legislative scrutiny.
